Ephemeral Delusion

Saturday, March 26, 2011, 4:06 PM
Exclusiveness? You've got it.

I had problem understanding the difference between the 2 terms, and no one i asked seemed to be able to give me a proper explanation (or at least one I could comprehend), hence out of frustration I decided to resort to googling it.

And to my surprise, there were as many confused ones out there in the WWW as well. I opened the first hit and took a good 5 minutes reading the article- beautifully written by the way, and like what Alexander Wallace would put it: I reached an epiphany.

It all boils down to the word exclusiveness. And trust me, you've got it nevertheless my adamant reclusiveness towards formality. Formality makes me laugh, just like how I lose it when boys play the guitar and sings for me. It makes me shudder (not the titillating kind unfortunately but more of the creeps), akin to the sound of nails scratching across the chalkboard. I know i sound impossibly incoherent already, but in short I think we ought to flow from phases to phases in life because it just seemed to me as a smoother transition.

Like my favorite analogy of separating an immiscible mixture in a separator funnel, although it is best if we can see the line and effectively close the tap exactly at where the two mixtures meet, but if everything is such clear in reality then where is there room for romance? Such distinctions will only meant that each step and procedure are laid out clean and crisp, allowing no room for imagination or creativity at all. I cannot tolerate a moment in life to be tasked like a robot.

In summary, I love the way boundaries are blurred for me, and my mischievous attempt to rub on it without tearing the paper is simply.. doped. Somehow perhaps I may need to clean up the act and learn how to behave like an adult, albeit the last few seconds I will savor thee.





Post a Comment
Friday, March 18, 2011, 8:51 PM
Sure we are subjected to our opinions, but you can't deny the tenacity of stratification or am I being not as in denial as compared to the public?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/18fri2.html?

Because frankly speaking, I suppose the UCLA ching chongs should have a fiercer retaliation towards excuses bestowed to such ethic slurs, in contrary to me on the opposite side of the plate.




Post a Comment
Sunday, March 13, 2011, 2:15 AM
Don't Judge!

I was doing some read-ups for my sociology's gender and sexuality chapter, and this particular argument in the book blew me away:

In 1995, Harvard Shakespeare professor Marjorie Garber made the academic case for bisexuality with her Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life, in which she argued that most people would be bisexual if not for "repression, religion, repugnance, denial, laziness, shyness, lack of opportunity, premature specialization, a failure of imagination, or a life already full to the brim with erotic experiences, albeit with only one person, or only one gender.


Garber. Marjorie B. (2000). Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life. New York: Routledge. p. 249.




Post a Comment
Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 10:28 PM

在这灯光下，你好美呀。




Post a Comment
Thursday, March 3, 2011, 1:49 PM
Brought me to tears reading this

http://af.reuters.com/article/libyaNews/idAFLDE70G18J20110119?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

"What kind of repression do you imagine it takes for a young man to do this? A man who has to feed his family by buying goods on credit when they fine him ... and take his goods. In Sidi Bouzid, those with no connections and no money for bribes are humiliated and insulted and not allowed to live."




Post a Comment

© 2010 | Ephemeral.Delusion |
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without permission.